Once in a while, there is a gem of a post which wakes me up from my slumber to do the needful
The jokers over at WSJ are at it again - stoking. Here is the link to an article which they swear would not write back in 2008, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304563104576361522020024248.html
Most sensible comment from this gentleman and another follow up
The only thing I'd modify is planning to stay in the home at least 7 years. Entry and exit costs are enormous on a house and easily dwarf most security deposits in the tightest of rental markets.
peace!
The jokers over at WSJ are at it again - stoking. Here is the link to an article which they swear would not write back in 2008, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304563104576361522020024248.html
Most sensible comment from this gentleman and another follow up
Other than that, this is one of the best sets of guidelines I've seen. :) Maybe the WSJ should post this instead.
peace!
No comments:
Post a Comment